San Diego County’s urban neighborhoods are becoming dangerous for street-crossing. Several cases of drivers killing pedestrians have been reported in the recent past, as per the SDME 2016 annual report. Many studies have been compiled to identify the most dangerous intersections in San Diego.
The findings came up with close to two-hundred hotspots, including areas previously detected by pedestrian advocates.
University Avenue in San Diego has been notorious for its dangerous intersections that pose issues to people travelling by foot. The problem with this corridor is that pedestrians are not being given the right-of-way like before. Almost everyone is trying to cut ahead and there are people on their phones while walking or in their cars.
Studies discovered that several perilous locations, leading to severe injuries and deaths, had wide streets and were close to major highways. For instance, the fourth most dangerous crossing on most lists was Chula Vista’s 4th Avenue and C Street, located close to Interstate 5 and Route 54. The seventh most hazardous intersection was Camino Del Rio and Sports Arena Boulevard. These are two big traffic arteries feeding into Interstates 8 and 5 directly.
The popular pedestrian crossings along the roads, where you could see cars traveling at speeds more than thirty-five miles per hour, are leading to disaster. The relatively freeway-rich San Diego has made drivers very used to the notion of traveling faster.
The possibility of death goes up significantly as speed heightens the impact. The chances of death are twenty-five percent when a pedestrian is hit by a vehicle that’s moving at a speed of close to twenty-three miles per hour—at forty-two miles per hour, fatalities will occur half the time and ninety percent of the time when the speed is fifty-eight miles per hour.
With walking-friendly urban environments becoming popular, potential for car-pedestrian collisions are going up. In the densest areas, where people regularly traverse intersections in hordes, an etiquette of sorts has developed between motorists and pedestrians. The most hazardous areas are places where this informal etiquette involving negotiation and choreography has just started to evolve.
If you’ve been involved in a road accident in San Diego, contact a car accident attorney in San Diego right away to procure compensation that you deserve for your property and personal losses.
Most injuries are sustained from accidents; nobody wants them to happen, but they come about anyway. Despite the lack of malicious intent, a closer look at the facts is likely to reveal some form of negligence by one or more parties. This carelessness may be used as basis to sue for compensation. So, how does negligence work in Indiana personal injury suits? Four elements must be present for negligence claims to be valid:
First, the plaintiff will need to establish duty of care. The defendant should have a legal responsibility that should have benefited the plaintiff. For example, a doctor has the duty to care for his patients: he should provide them with competent medical advice and services. Motorists have the duty to follow traffic laws that should benefit fellow commuters and other road users. Employers have the duty to provide a reasonably safe environment for their workers. Owners of commercial establishments have the duty to care for their customers while they are on the premises.
Once the duty of care has been established, the next step is for the plaintiff to show that there was a breach of this duty. The defendant could have done this with or without full-knowledge. Failure to realize risk from actions or inactions is considered negligence, since a reasonable person in the same situation is expected to realize the fault. For example, a doctor may have failed to warn his patients about the risks involved in medical treatments before proceeding. Patients should be given pertinent information to help them make an intelligent, informed decision. An employer may have been negligent in giving workers proper training, safety gear, and well-maintained equipment.
The plaintiff must have sustained compensable losses. This could be in the form of a bodily injury which resulted in medical bills or perhaps property damage which will have to be remedied through repairs or replacement. These costly services can be a major financial burden to the plaintiff. It is reasonable to expect them to seek assistance in the form of monetary compensation from the person who has the legal liability. Other types of damages that can merit compensation include lost wages, reduced quality of life, and hardships that fall under the term “pain and suffering.”
The last step is to link the defendant’s actions to the damages. Before compensation can be awarded, the plaintiff must prove to the court that the injuries suffered were truly caused by the defendant. If a motorist was following too closely and rear-ended the vehicle in front of it, then he or she will be liable for the damage to the car and any injuries to the occupants.
Note that Indiana uses comparative fault in determining the award in a successful suit. If both parties are at-fault, then the final amount will be reduced in proportion to the blame. A plaintiff who is deemed have twenty percent of the fault will only be able to recover eighty percent of the damages. Learn more about this by consulting an Indianapolis injury attorney.